Site Tools: RSS | Email Alerts | Mobile | twitter facebook      

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects San Diego County's Medical Marijuana Challenge


Last Update: 5/18/2009 12:00 pm
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Print Story |
SAN DIEGO - The U.S. Supreme Court is refusing to hear a case in which the counties of San Diego and San Bernardino challenged the validity of California's medical marijuana laws.

Monday's decision by the high court not to hear San Diego's appeal means that on June 16, officials will recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the county issue medical marijuana ID cards as required by state law, said Senior Deputy Counsel Counsel Thomas Bunton.

Thirteen states -- including California -- have laws that allow certain seriously ill patients to use medical marijuana if their doctor recommends it.

"The Supreme Court and the lower court in California have blown away the myth that federal law somehow prevents states from legalizing medical marijuana," said Rob Kampia, executive director for the Marijuana Policy Project. "Opponents can no longer hide behind federal law in order to excuse their war on medical marijuana patients."

San Diego, Merced and San Bernardino counties sued the state in February 2006, claiming federal laws banning marijuana use and possession supercedes Proposition 215, a state measure approved by voters in 1996 that allows pot dispensaries to sell the drug to people who have a doctor's prescription.

The counties' challenge was rejected by the San Diego Superior Court in 2006, and that court's decision was upheld last July by the 4th District Court of Appeal.

Last October, the California Supreme Court declined to review the appellate court's decision and the case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The lower and appellate courts found that the state's program for issuing ID cards to medical marijuana users is valid and does not violate the state constitution. 

"I am disappointed the Court did not take our case, but I am respectful of the Court's decision," said San Diego County Supervisor Dianne Jacob.   "We were seeking a definitive ruling, in writing, that would resolve that conflict between state and federal law.  In my opinion, there remains a gray area that will continue to pose challenges for law enforcement and users," said Jacob. 
Print Story |

Featured Comments
severed - 5/18/2009 9:23 PM
Diane Jacobs needs to be kicked out of office... and anyone who wasted my tax money on this craptastic endenvor.





Twitter Updates

San Diego 6 Twitter Page
Connect with San Diego 6 News
SanDiego6.com wants to feature your stories, photos, and videos here on the site! You can also find us on various social sites.
   
   
Promotions and Contests
  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital Media.